AdaCamp SF

Jun. 11th, 2013 08:49 pm

I made it to AdaCamp SF over the weekend, and despite feeling extremely amateur compared to all the awesome women there, I have been inspired to finally contribute to an open source project! I especially like Dreamwidth because of their emphasis on training non-developers, so I guess I will be making flailing attempts at learning Perl. *crosses fingers* Reading about their experiences at YAPC makes them sound like a fun group of people to work with. Also, they need UI people, so that’s good.

Anyway, hopefully there will be more progress reports re: coding attempts.

K. Joyce Tsai | Comments

  1. I fail miserably at Safeway’s self-checkout system. On the other hand, why in the world would you put the “Clear” button where the giant “0″ button usually is on a computer numpad?
  2. I’ve just been reading Siddhartha Mukherjee’s The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer and was extremely amused to find the library sticker for “biography” on its spine.

K. Joyce Tsai | Comments

Asia Pacific Arts has published “Hail to the Bitter Melon Council,” an article I wrote about the National Bitter Melon Council, an organization that’s part vegetable promotion board and part artist collective.

K. Joyce Tsai | Comments

Ereaders

Apr. 4th, 2011 03:24 pm

Prior to winning not one, but two (!!), ereaders in online giveaways, I was unconvinced as to the value of a $100+ single-use device. That said, I had also been contemplating getting an ereader for nearly a year.

To give people a sense of what type of reader I am: I read approximately 100+ books and 200+ volumes of manga a year. I buy books from online retailers, used bookstores, large retail chains, library sales, Goodwill stores, and basically anywhere that sells books. I borrow books from several local libraries and my friends, who sometimes I conveniently define as anyone willing to lend me books. I get books for free via Bookmooch and from friends and blog acquaintances and authors willing to give out ARCs and any sort of giveaway. In short, I read, and I read a lot, and I get my grubby hands on books by any means possible. I have also been borrowing ebooks from my public libraries and reading them on my iPhone and on my laptops. As of yet, I have been unconcerned with buying books directly from an ereader device largely because I refuse to pay for DRM-ed ebooks, and because I still value having a print copy of a book.

Prior to winning my ereaders, my primary form of acquiring and reading ebooks was borrowing ebooks from the public library and reading them on my laptop via Adobe Digital Editions. I would buy a few, but overall, I dislike buying ebooks without some sort of ebook + physical book bundle. I’ve also been reading my non-library ebooks on my iPhone via Stanza.

Despite having tried two devices—the Kobo wireless ereader and the Alex Spring Design ereader—I’m still unconvinced as to the value of a standalone ereader. I wanted one because I spend enough time on the computer anyway, and the LCD screens on both the laptop and the iPhone cause a fair amount of eyestrain for me. I also like the greater portability of ereaders when compared to my netbook, particularly in terms of size and weight. Both of these options ruled out tablet devices using LCD screens, and I like my netbook enough that I’d rather have a dedicated eink device instead of a tablet that can’t quite do as much as my netbook but costs much more than an ereader.

I very much like how light the ereaders are, particularly when compared to my netbook: it makes it that much more likely that I’ll dump it in my purse before heading out of the house. The eink screens have also been much better on my eyes than LCD screens. Really, though, the best part of having an ereader is traveling. I used to time airplane flights by how many books I could read on them; for someone who reads roughly a hundred pages an hour, a ten-hour flight requires a lot of books! Having an ereader reduced my luggage weight considerably, though I still packed a backup book or two for that half hour you’re not allowed to turn on electronics during the flight. The iPhone works for this purpose as well, but I find prolonged reading on an LCD screen strains my eyes.

Still, I’m not sure the added convenience while traveling compensates for the price tag and for having yet another device and yet another charger to keep track of. It’s particularly so for me, since I don’t buy ebooks from either Spring Design or Kobo, meaning I have to pre-load my ereader with whatever I’d like for my trip, instead of acquiring new books during the trip. I realize the last inconvenience is more a self-imposed one than anything else, but I’m still holding out for being able to get a physical and electronic copy of a book while paying a bit more than for just a physical version. As someone who reads a lot and borrows books a lot, I don’t find it worth it to have a DRM-ed digital book I can’t lend to friends.

K. Joyce Tsai | Comments

I had some general thoughts on ereaders last time, but since I’ve been looking at the new Nook Touch, I’ve been nitpicking much more at my current ereaders.

As previously noted, I don’t think I would have shelled out the nearly $400 for the Alex Spring Design ereader, but free things are always good! That said, I’m still thinking about selling it and getting a Nook Touch for several reasons.

The LCD screen running Android was a nice touch prior to the enabling touch for eink devices, but now that you can use an eink interface with touch, I think the battery drain of the LCD screen and the overall weight it adds to the device isn’t worth it. I could browse the internet with my Alex, but since I use it primarily for reading books and since I have an iPhone, I didn’t particularly feel the need to do so. Instead, I kept the wireless turned off most of the time to save on battery.

My main issue with the Alex is that it’s a niche product. No matter what people think of them, the Nook and Kindle are currently ereader market leaders, with Sony and Kobo trailing behind. Sadly, the Alex is pretty much nonexistent. Since I use Calibre to manage all my ebooks, the lack of Alex users is particularly frustrating, since the Calibre designers don’t really take the Alex into account.

I don’t blame them, of course, but it is annoying for me as a user.

Because of this, I’ve felt as though my ability to manage my ebook library is particularly limited. Basic syncing and metadata editing work fine, but while Alex supports different categories for books, it only allows you to edit those categories via the ereader.

In other words, if I want to categorize my 300+ ebooks, I have to go through them one by one to do so. I had started doing that, only to discover that whenever I synced the Alex with Calibre, all the category data got erased. Argh!! This probably wouldn’t be an issue with a smaller collection, but since I’m sure my ebook collection is only going to get larger, the inability to categorize my books is going to make browsing more and more unwieldy as time goes by.

Which brings me to another thing… I have no idea why, but Alex gives you the choice of organizing books via author or by title. All well and good, except it organizes authors alphabetically via first name. Possibly this has to do with my using Calibre instead of the Alex ereader software, but it’s pretty frustrating.

In conclusion, the Alex is a nice device, but I think I’ll be eyeing the Nook Touch for a while. Its smaller size, faster page turns, and lighter weight make it a much more attractive deal.

K. Joyce Tsai | Comments

Gogh Bike

Mar. 4th, 2011 03:18 pm

Gogh Bike is a tangible user interface harnessing the physical affordances of a bicycle for collaborative creative expression. Users paint by pedaling and steering the bicycle, which directs a virtual paintbrush on a projected screen. Gogh Bike is also collaborative: bystanders can select the color the bicyclist paints with by mixing virtual paint in a bucket on the back of the bicycle.

How It Works

Close Up of the Gogh Bike

Close Up of the Gogh Bike

Gogh Bike is a bicycle mounted on a stationary trainer, with various sensors detecting the rotation of the handlebars and the front wheel’s rotational speed. The bike also detects when the brake is pressed, which signals picking up the paintbrush so that the painter can pedal to a different section of the canvas without leaving a trail. The bike also has a paint can mounted on its back, and the virtual paint gradually runs out as the user pedals. Bystanders can add paint by tipping buckets emitting colored light into the paint bucket on the back of the bicycle, and by doing so, they can also mix colors for the painter. The bucket on the back of the bicycle has row of LEDs wired to reflect both the color of the paint inside the bucket and the amount of paint. As users pour the colored light in, a speaker by the side of the bike emits glugging noises and the indicator on the bucket rises to provide feedback that the pouring has worked.

Process

Gogh Bike was the final project for my Fall 2009 Tangible User Interfaces class. I worked on it with Ryan Greenberg and Ben Cohen. Most tangible user interfaces using bicycles attempt to encourage exercise or to simulate an actual bicycle ride, but we wanted to explore what a bike’s affordances could do with an art project. We began with the idea of painting on the floor with bicycle tracks, much like the 2009 BMW Z4 ad and [city tracking project thingum], then translated the painting to a digital surface so that the resulting paintings could be saved, and out of the practical limitation of having to demonstrate the project in a small space at the end of the semester. We also wanted to play with the idea of collaborative creation, and as the three of us tossed around ideas of the audience being able to throw in wind, or sunshine, or other things affecting the bike ride, we came up with the idea of a paint bucket mounted on the back of the bicycle that collaborators could mix paint in. We added the glugging noise after hooking up the bucket, as we found it difficult to pour the light precisely into the bucket so that the color indicator would detect the correct color. With the glugging noise, there was aural and visual feedback.

Challenges

The three of us had little to no experience in mechanical engineering, and having to troubleshoot hardware along with software issues was a challenge we didn’t have much experience with. For example, our greatest mechanical difficulty was figuring out how to detect the rotation of the bicycle’s front wheel. Our first steering mechanism looked flimsy, but the combination of chopsticks and duct tape proved to have the benefits of flexibility. Although the mechanism held during the first two demonstrations of Gogh Bike, the weak point proved to be the hot glue attaching the potentiometer to the bike handles. For Maker Faire, Ben and I reworked the steering system and used foam to hold the potentiometer to the bottom of the bike, hoping that keeping it out of the user’s way would hold it together longer. It broke after the first day at Maker Faire, but after repairing it overnight, the steering stayed functional through the rest of the fair. Since I worked primarily on the mechanical aspects of the project, my greatest challenges were thinking of creative, affordable solutions to problems such as the steering. Ben provided knowledge of assorted Home Depot things, whereas my strengths lie in adapting materials for unconventional uses.

Assessment

Although users enjoyed painting with Gogh Bike during the Tangible User Interfaces class fair, the kids at Maker Faire loved it and would line up to both bike and to pour and mix paint. The hundred or so kids who used the bike also provided a great deal of stress testing.

Links

K. Joyce Tsai | Comments

Profile

kjoycetsai

June 2013

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910 1112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags